We are offering the Original / Replacement and Customize Power Supplier for notebook computer,cell phone devise.
The newest 39W USB-C Apple power adapter is coming soon.
Most of products are enjoy two-year warranty or money back!
New promotion for the apple macbook charger for the 45W 60W 85W 29W 30W 61W and 87W
We are always looking for the partner in the local market. Win-Win Cooperation for all business partner!
If you can not find the right laptop battery ac adapter and power adapter for your devise ,just contact us!
If you have any questions, drop us a line. If you are looking for a something that you don't see here, ask us. We will get back to you soon and let you know if it is something we can find for you.
Lika is a Laptop Battery|Notebook Battery|Notebook Akku|Batterie|Chargeur|AC Charger|AC Adapter|Power Adapter|Power Supply|Type-C Charger|USB-C Charger|PD Charger|Cell Phone Charger|Mobile Phone Charger|Fast Charger|Wireless Charger|Printer AC Charger Manufacturer Since 2005! We're focus on Battery and Charger’s production & distribution! New isn’t enough. We aim to only offer products that look amazing, feel great, are easy to use and last ages. Products are CE & ROHS Certificated by SGS.
We are offering Original & Replacement
Apple Macbook Battery|Apple Macbook Charger|Acer Laptop Battery|Acer AC Charger|Clevo Laptop Battery|Asus Laptop Battery|Asus AC Charger|Dell Laptop Battery|Dell AC Charger|Delta AC Charger|Fujitsu Laptop Battery|Fujitsu AC Charger|Gateway AC Charger|HP Laptop Battery|HP AC Charger|LCD AC Charger|Lenovo Laptop Battery|Lenovo AC Charger|LG Laptop Battery|LG AC Charger|Liteon AC Charger|LS AC Charger|MSI Laptop Battery|Model AC Charger|NEC AC Charger|Panasonic AC Charger|Samsung Laptop Battery|Samsung AC Charger|Sharp AC Charger|ServerAC Charger|Sony Laptop Battery|Sony AC Charger|Surface AC Charger|Toshiba Laptop Battery|Toshiba AC Charger|Tablet AC Charger|Winbook AC Charger
We also offering the Genuine & Replacement Acessories for Iphone Samsang LG Sony Huawei etc.
We are launching a BIG Promotions for Laptop Battery|Notebook Battery|Notebook Akku|Batterie|Chargeur|AC Charger|AC Adapter|Power Adapter|Power Supply|Type-C Charger|USB-C Charger|PD Charger|Cell Phone Charger|Mobile Phone Charger|Fast Charger|Wireless Charger|Printer AC Charger
+ Event Details
WASHINGTON — President Trump’s chief economic adviser said on Sunday that American
consumers would bear some pain from the escalating trade war with China, contradicting
Mr. Trump’s claim that his tariffs are a multibillion-dollar, mostly one-way payment by
China to the American Treasury.
The comments from Larry Kudlow, the director of the National Economic Council, came
after the 11th round of trade negotiations broke off without a deal, prompting Mr. Trump
to raise tariffs on $200 billion worth of Chinese products and begin a process to impose
levies on nearly every product China exports to the United States.
“In fact, both sides will pay,” Mr. Kudlow said on “Fox News Sunday.” “Both sides
will suffer on this.”
Mr. Kudlow’s acknowledgment of economic pain, while widely shared by economists,
contradicted the president’s view that trade wars are easy to win and that the burden
falls disproportionately on America’s trading partners.
Both Mr. Kudlow and the president say that a protracted trade war will ultimately be in
the United States’ financial interest. Mr. Kudlow said that any pain would be worth the
price if it forced China to treat American companies more fairly.
“You’ve got to do what you got to do,” Mr. Kudlow said. “We have had unfair trading
practices all these years and so in my judgment, the economic consequences are so small
that the possible improvement in trade and exports and open markets for the United
States, this is worthwhile doing.”
Negotiations between the countries broke down last week after administration officials
accused the Chinese of backtracking on several key provisions of a proposed deal,
including agreeing to codify changes in Chinese law. Administration officials insist the
talks have been constructive, and say they will continue; Mr. Kudlow said that could
possibly include a meeting next month between Mr. Trump and President Xi Jinping of
China at the Group of 20 summit meeting next month in Osaka, Japan. But Mr. Trump has
muddied that message with tweets suggesting he would be happy to leave tariffs in place
Mr. Trump’s confidence in the strength of the American economy is fueling his decision
to escalate the trade fight. But it is an economic gamble, one that could inflict
lasting damage depending on how far Mr. Trump is willing to take his battle and what it
produces in the end.
In a tweet on Sunday, Mr. Trump said the United States was “right where we want to be
with China,” adding that the United States “will be taking in Tens of Billions of
Dollars in Tariffs from China.”
Economists differ on how much the trade war will crimp economic growth, but most agree
that the cost of tariffs is passed on to businesses or consumers in the form of higher
prices on everything, including lighting fixtures and art supplies. Among the items
covered by the administration’s latest increase in tariffs to 25 percent: computers,
toilet paper, dog collars, Christmas tree lights and mattress supports.
The new tariff will not knock the American economy into recession, forecasters say, but
it will hurt economic growth — and could do so drastically — if Mr. Trump follows
through with his plan to place the tariff on all imports from China.
The United States imported $540 billion worth of goods from China in 2018, according to
“Trump is dragging a dangerous misconception into a critical moment in his standoff
with the Chinese,” Chad Bown, an expert on trade at the Peterson Institute for
International Economics, said last week. “And American businesses and consumers stand
to pay the price.”
Tariffs enacted last year reduced the inflation-adjusted income of American consumers by
$4.4 billion each month by November, according to one study. That loss, which arose both
from the tariff and from more expensive or foregone imports, breaks out to about $419
per household over a year. The latest round of increases will push the per-household
cost above $800, said David Weinstein, a Columbia University economist and a co-author
on the research.
But the decision to prolong the trade war could upend economic projections that showed
robust hiring, growth and investment this year, in part because of fading concerns about
a protracted trade fight. And it could defy steady predictions by administration
economists that Mr. Trump’s trade policy will help increase growth in 2019 to 3.2
percent — well above what most other forecasters expect.
“There is absolutely no question that these tariffs, if imposed and sustained, increase
the probability of a recession,” Rob Martin, a former Fed section chief who is now an
executive director at UBS, said of a potential escalation. “It makes you more
Mr. Martin and his colleagues estimate that Mr. Trump’s latest increase could shave
0.25 to 0.35 percentage points off gross domestic product over six months. If the
remainder of China’s products get hit with a 25 percent tariff, it could shave up to
another full percentage point from G.D.P.
“If we move into that next tranche of tariffs, we’re in 100 percent uncharted
territory,” Mr. Martin said. The products in that category are about two-thirds
consumer goods and for many — which could include toys, bicycles and iPhones — it
could be hard to find quick substitutes.
A prolonged trade war could inflict damage on China’s economy. Economic growth in China
slowed in the second half of last year, in part because tariffs hurt business
confidence. Since then, the Chinese government has poured billions of dollars into the
financial system and pressed state-run banks into service extending credit.
Officials said last month that the economy grew 6.4 percent in the first quarter of the
year, matching the pace from the previous quarter.
But Mr. Trump is clearly banking on a protracted fight to shift the economic calculus,
warning China in a tweet that “a deal will become far worse for them if it has to be
negotiated in my second term.”
While Mr. Trump is confident in his approach, his decision to add new trade barriers
with China — in the form of higher tariffs — has confounded analysts and some business
groups that have otherwise praised his handling of the economy.
Analysts at the Tax Foundation, a Washington think tank that forecast a large increase
to economic growth from the tax cuts Mr. Trump signed in 2017, now say that the tariffs
the president has put in place or threatened — and the effects of Chinese retaliatory
tariffs on American exporters — would more than cancel out all the economic benefits of
the tax law.
“The tariffs, if allowed to continue, will mute the economic benefits of tax reform,”
said Nicole M. Kaeding, a Tax Foundation economist — particularly for low- and middle-
income consumers who will be stuck paying higher prices. “Economists argue about many
things, but the impact of tariffs on the economy is not debated. They are harmful.”
Many of those groups say growth would be even stronger this year if Mr. Trump had
reached a deal with China and averted a prolonged government shutdown. They blame Mr.
Trump’s fundamental misunderstanding of tariffs — which he believes are lifting the
economy — for driving the country into a danger zone.
Analysts at Goldman Sachs said in a research note that further escalation of the trade
war could reduce growth by nearly half a percentage point this year, and that “if trade
tensions sparked a major sell-off in the equity market, the growth impact could worsen
Stocks swooned last week but had begun to rebound by Friday afternoon. Financial
conditions have tightened, but remain well below levels seen late last year.
“So far, U.S. markets don’t express a lot of concern — I think everybody expects a
deal,” said Roberto Perli, an economist at Cornerstone Macro. “The risk is that time
passes, nothing happens and the market realizes — maybe we were too optimistic.”
Mr. Trump has expressed satisfaction with “big beautiful tariffs” that he said were
producing “billions of dollars” for America.
“I am very happy with over $100 Billion a year in Tariffs filling U.S. coffers…great
for U.S., not good for China,” Mr. Trump said on Twitter last week.
Of the $419-per-household cost of last year’s tariffs, most of the hit — $286 — came
from the levy itself. Because the American government collected that money, it was able
to redistribute it, including through a $12 billion program of farm subsidies. But that
could change as the trade war persists.
“It’s pretty likely that the tariff revenue is going to fall,” Mr. Weinstein of
Columbia University said, as firms find themselves unable to shoulder the higher rates
and stop importing from China. “We’re going to see a lot of supply chains shifting
That means Chinese companies will also lose out as businesses buy more American-made
goods or continue turning to other low-cost producers outside China, like Vietnam and
Mr. Trump’s shift on tariffs appears to have surprised Fed officials, who had been
expecting the trade dispute to calm down. This month, the Fed chairman, Jerome H.
Powell, told reporters at a news conference that risks to growth from trade policy had
“moderated somewhat,” citing “reports of progress in the trade talks between the
United States and China.”
It is unlikely that Mr. Powell and his colleagues will react quickly to the higher
tariffs and renewed trade war. The Fed will most likely judge any inflation that comes
from trade policy as temporary, and may want to see economic growth weakening before
acting on it through a rate cut or other measures.
“The Fed is unlikely to act immediately, in part because it is unclear whether this
drama will end in a deal, an all-out trade war or something in between,” said Krishna
Guha, head of the Global Policy and Central Bank Strategy team at advisory firm Evercore
If the central bank does react, it is more likely that it would cut rates to offset the
economic pain. Raphael Bostic, the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta,
said at a National Association for Business Economics conference last week that the
tariff increase could prompt a rate cut if higher costs cause consumers to pull back, “
depending on the severity of the response.”
Mr. Guha concurred, saying that the Fed would not hesitate to react if there were signs
of a real risk to economic growth. Instead, they will most likely “cut rates on
insurance grounds, in particular given weak inflation.”
A version of this article appears in print on May 13, 2019 of the New York edition with the headline: Tariffs on China Will Exact Cost For ‘Both Sides’. Order Reprints | Today’s Paper | Subscribe